It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army. The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention. This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed.
This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves. The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion.
The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions. For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people.
If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun.
More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people.
People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun.
Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence. For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence. The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him.
This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime. However, when he has been led out of using the drugs, he will not use the gun wrongly, and will continue keeping and bearing it for the right purpose, which is self- defense and protecting the interests of the nation, as outlined in the constitution Dixon, Ideally, the legislations that have been created for gun control are meant for the criminals.
It goes without saying that criminals do not follow the law, and making such legislation does not stop them from committing their crimes. Criminals are very conversant with the laws and they intentionally break them so that they get what they want. The new laws that have been created for gun control are, therefore, going to affect the citizens who are not criminals and are held illegible to carry the guns.
This would be unfair to them because the criminals will always have their own ways to hide and use the guns even when the new laws are being put into practice. With this in mind, the rate of crime and violence is likely to shoot up since it is in the knowledge of the criminals that people are not holding guns, and they can, therefore, use their guns more freely than they would have used them when people are holding guns Spitzer It has also been concluded that gun laws do not work in any way.
This is in reference of earlier legislations that had been placed in hopes that they would be able to regulate gun violence. For instance, there was a law that existed between and The law required that no one was allowed to carry guns, but it did not work as gun violence did not reduce, as expected. This shows that there is little or no correlation between gun violence and the enactment of the ban on firearm holding in the U. The legislation itself had loopholes, which the criminals used in keeping and using the guns wrongly.
Other factors that may have a higher degree of correlation with gun violence are factors such as having mental illness and using drugs wrongly. When the government concentrates on confiscating guns on a measure to reduce gun violence, it will lose the track and violence will still be on the rise. Gun control is such a broad topic that a gun control essay can be virtually anything. The issue can be seen from so many angles and discussed on so many levels, that you can tackle such an issue however you like in your essay.
As a student, you know that there are several kinds of essays which differ in their form, content, and purpose. Gun control essays are no exception. Here are the kinds of essays that you may be assigned to write on gun control:. Descriptive gun control essay. A descriptive essay is where you describe the topic in terms of senses. In our case, you write about the images, sounds, or even smells you can associate with the total absence of individually possessed firearms or with their overwhelming amounts.
Definition gun control essay. A definition essay is set to define the notion of its topic. In this case, you will talk about what a gun control is. It is not unlike an article in a dictionary. Compare and contrast gun control essay. A compare and contrast essay describes the differences and similarities between the two issues.
In our case, you can — for example — talk about how different are the people of opposing standpoints on gun control. Cause and effect essay on gun control. A cause and effect essay takes a certain event existing or suggested and investigates its consequences.
Here, you can, for example, talk about what would total ban on individual firearm possession lead to. Narrative gun control essay. A narrative essay tells a story. Process gun control essay. A process essay basically talks about how to do something, how to reach point B from point A. For example, your point A can be where the mass shootings are possible, and point B — where they are impossible. Argumentative gun control essay.
An argumentative essay is where you convince your reader that your argument is valid. In this case, you substantiate your stand on gun control. Critical gun control essay. A critical essay discusses the advantages and disadvantages of its subject. You can discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a certain approach to gun control. Expository essay on gun control. An expository essay sets out to describe the issue in its current state, without any evaluations. Here, you can talk about the current state of the gun control regulations.
Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is where you have to convince an opponent that you are right. For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem. Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays.
So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control. Usually, an exciting argumentative essay starts with a controversial topic that suggests two or more polar opinions on it. With gun control, it should not pose any problem. You do have to avoid any emotional language, but you still need to have your own argument on the issue. Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument.
This may include collecting evidence in support of the opposing argument for you to rebuke. There is a lot of material on both sides of the argument, so even an extensive research for your gun control argumentative essay should not be too challenging. Once you have conducted your research, it is time to start writing. Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement.
The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one. Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first. This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim.
Let us take a closer look at these ways. The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality. Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion. Ethos employs authority and appeals to the sense of ethics. As we have mentioned, an argumentative essay focuses on proving the rightness of your argument rationally - so, it employs logos as the only method of persuasion.
In a persuasive essay, on the other hand, you focus on your result - persuading your reader. Thus, you can employ whichever of the three methods of persuasion you like in any combination. When we talk specifically about gun control, it is a heavily emotional topic, so it is hard to stick to dry facts and logic exclusively.
So, when writing a gun control persuasive essay, not only logical but also ethical and emotional appeal is probably much easier than writing an argumentative essay and sticking to logic. Consequentially, an argumentative essay suggests that you use neutral language at all times, whereas in a persuasive essay you can relax and write in moderately emotional language here and there.
The writing and pre-writing processes for a persuasive essay will not be different from those for an argumentative one: As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic. Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers. If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it down according to your personal and academic interest.
Still, if you find a particular gun control-related topic interesting, it is not enough to make a good topic for a research paper. It also has to be original, i. On the bright side, you usually will not have to pick a fixed topic and stick to it.
At the initial stage of your work, you can formulate your subject somewhat vaguely and specify and adjust the topic to your liking with the course of your research. Another distinct feature of a research paper is that it needs a presentable list of referenced sources. You do not have to stick to other authors' writing here.
You are also allowed often even encouraged to get and use your own empirical findings.
Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Argumentative Essay On Gun Control.
Free gun control papers, essays, and research papers.
Gun control essays occur ever more often in the curriculum, given the actuality of the topic. How to prepare yourself for writing such essays? Mar 24, · Free Essays from Bartleby | Gun Control Gun Control is a topic that has been talked about for many years now especially after many tragic deaths and other.
Argumentative Essay on Gun Control Gun Control Essay Gun Control A problem that has developed recently in our society is the debate over gun control. Gun Control Essay Do we really need gun control? America has recently witnessed a number of shooting and indiscriminate firing incidents in schools, malls, and villages.